Organised gangs of government soldiers and militias hacked their way through the Tutsi population with machetes, or blew them up in churches where they had taken refuge.
The extremist ethnic Hutu regime in office in appeared genuinely to believe that the only way it could hang on to power was by wiping out the ethnic Tutsis completely.
Encouraged by the presidential guard and radio propaganda, an unofficial militia group called the Interahamwe meaning those who attack together was mobilised. At its peak, this group was 30,strong. Soldiers and police officers encouraged ordinary citizens to take part. In some cases, Hutu civilians were forced to murder their Tutsi neighbours by military personnel. Participants were often given incentives, such as money or food, and some were even told they could appropriate the land of the Tutsis they killed.
On the ground at least, the Rwandans were largely left alone by the international community. Most of the UN troops withdrew after the murder of 10 soldiers. The day after Habyarimana's death, the RPF renewed their assault on government forces, and numerous attempts by the UN to negotiate a ceasefire came to nothing.
The government collapsed and the RPF declared a ceasefire. These refugees include many who have since been implicated in the massacres. At first, a multi-ethnic government was set up, with a Hutu, Pasteur Bizimungu as president and Mr Kagame as his deputy. But the pair later fell out and Bizimungu was jailed on charges of inciting ethnic violence, while Mr Kagame became president.
Although the killing in Rwanda was over, the presence of Hutu militias in DR Congo has led to years of conflict there, causing up to five million deaths. Rwanda's now Tutsi-led government has twice invaded its much larger neighbour, saying it wants to wipe out the Hutu forces.
And a Congolese Tutsi rebel group remains active, refusing to lay down arms, saying otherwise its community would be at risk of genocide. The world's largest peacekeeping force has been unable to end the fighting.
Human Rights Watch report. Republic of Rwanda. The militias were horrifyingly efficient, using a radio station to coordinate the beginnings of the campaign around the country and to tell people where " the graves were not quite yet full.
Unlike earlier mass killings, such as the Holocaust, the international community had advance evidence of the coming genocide.
Once it launched, they had evidence of where it was going, and still did nothing. Canadian General Romeo Dallaire, who commanded the small UN observer force tasked with implementing the peace agreement, heard the Hutus were planning genocide in January He informed the higher-ups at the UN, but wasn't permitted to act. Even after the genocide began, and the evidence of slaughter became undeniable, the international community did nothing.
In hindsight, there's a good chance the UN could have done something. General Dallaire believes that, with an extra 5, troops and a stronger UN mandate, he could have saved " hundreds of thousands. Two major Obama administration officials — Susan Rice and Samantha Power — became converted to the cause of humanitarian intervention in part due to America's inaction in Rwanda. The day after the genocide began, the Tutsi rebel group RPF, led by Paul Kagame, launched an offensive aimed at toppling the Rwandan government.
In about one hundred days, the RPF defeated the government forces. Kagame, a Tutsi, became the country's leader in all but name: a Hutu was technically made president while Kagame was vice president, but Kagame controlled the army. Sadly, there's no reason to stop worrying about Rwanda even 20 years after the genocide.
Though the RPF stopped the genocide from reaching its completion, their victory was hardly clean. These "revenge killings" by oppressed are sadly common after episodes of mass killing, and one reason why the lack of international peacekeeping forces can be so devastating. That war, the deadliest since World War 2 , was sparked in part by 2 million Hutus fleeing Rwanda attacking Tutsis.
Some of the 2 million were militiamen, who attacked Tutsis in the DRC. The Kagame government supported local Tutsi forces, and the conflict escalated.
Today, Kagame still runs Rwanda — he's officially been president since His record has been extraordinarily mixed; he's done an incredible job helping rebuild life in Rwanda since the genocide, but he's also sponsored violence around the region, killed political dissidents, and consolidated authoritarian power. Start with the good. Rwanda's life expectancy has doubled in the past decade, and child mortality and HIV rates have plummeted.
The Rwandan economy has grown at a staggeringly high 8 percent rate since , making it, by one assessment, the most desirable African country to invest in. However, Kagame's government is described by his critics as an ethnic autocracy. Tutsis who make up 10 percent of the government staff most official positions, especially in the military. Kagame has supported murderous foreign militias, like the M23 in the DRC, and may have been complicit in revenge killings.
Perhaps most ominously, a statistical assessment of the risk of state-led mass killing puts Rwanda in the top 15 percent of countries most likely to see mass killing. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower through understanding. Financial contributions from our readers are a critical part of supporting our resource-intensive work and help us keep our journalism free for all. In this essay, the causes of modern genocide will be investigated using these three genocides as case studies.
There are various reasons why genocide may occur and it is often a combination of circumstances that leads to genocide. The present essay will investigate the underlying conditions that make genocide possible, while leaving out catalytic events that may trigger genocide.
The essay will firstly draw on the works of Horkheimer and Adorno in examining the relations between Enlightenment ideas and genocide. The correlations between war and economic crises will be subject to analysis in the second part of the essay.
Finally, the creation of out-groups and in-groups will be explored. While these are certainly not the only causes of genocide, they may be deemed to be pre-conditions. Similarly, Foster 2 sees the Holocaust as an aberration of an enlightened and developed nation.
However, there are other scholars who argue that genocide is not an exception of Enlightenment but in fact a result of it. Horkheimer and Adorno argue that the ideals of Enlightenment, which are human emancipation and rationality, alienate humans from nature and result in men wanting to control nature and, in turn, other people as well.
Bauman 91 , continuing this idea over a decade later, proposes that since the Enlightenment, the extermination of a people serves to establish a perfect society. Armenians Balakian , Jews Bauman 76 and Tutsi Mullen were seen as worthless groups standing between a population and the realisation of such a perfect society. Not only medical terms were used to justify the killings. Gardening metaphors can also be found. Naturally, not every enlightened nation will descend into genocide.
According to Staub 98 , an important indicator for the potential of future genocide is a difficult life condition, such as war or an economic crisis. He argues that during times of hardship, humans feel the need to protect themselves, which can result in losing respect for another group or blaming that group for the present conditions.
However, Staub 99 says that people also feel the need to belong to something bigger during these times and therefore create an in-group together alongside an out-group.
The parallels between war and genocide will now be examined, before the connection between economic crisis and genocide is made. According to Bartrop , a strong link exists between war and genocide since the First World War. Shaw supports this notion. According to both Bartrop and Shaw , the presence of war shapes the psyche of a population and makes their willingness to kill certain groups more likely. In the Ottoman Empire during the Second World War, Turkish leaders suspected the Armenians to be cooperating with Russia, which provided the rationale behind killing the entire group Hamburg The Holocaust, too, was used as a means to quietly destroy an undesired minority Hamburg Jews were blamed for every woe of Germany, just like the Armenians were seen as an enemy to the state.
Nazis blamed the loss of World War I on the Jews, which made it legitimate to kill that group Campbell Fifty years later, in , every Tutsi in Rwanda was accused of being part of the invading rebel army, the Rwandan Patriotic Front RPF , which consisted primarily of members of the Tutsi minority Hintjens War is an exceptionally difficult life condition during which innocent groups can be seen as threats; grievances towards that group are in rare occasions handled through genocide Campbell The second difficult life condition Staub refers to is one of economic crisis.
As with war, during times of a recession, people are inclined to find someone to blame for their misfortune Hamburg Local leaders have learned that these feelings can be easily manipulated for their own goals, which may be the elimination of an unwanted minority Hamburg Victims are often portrayed as wealthy and as willing to take advantage of other groups, which justifies killing that group Hamburg
0コメント